Subscribe to CFO Forecasting
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form
Let’s talk about data—your new best friend or your worst nightmare, depending on how you handle it. You see, we’re living in a world overflowing with data. Every swipe, click, and tap creates a trail of information, and business leaders are swimming in it, trying to make sense of the chaos. But here’s the catch: Not all data is equal, and how you interpret it can make or break your decisions.
Imagine this: You’ve got a shiny new report in front of you, full of numbers and charts, and you’re trying to figure out whether the conclusions it draws apply to your business. It’s tempting to either embrace it wholeheartedly or throw it out the window if it doesn’t seem to fit. But both of these extremes are dangerous. Why? Because data without scrutiny is just noise, and dismissing it without analysis could mean missing out on valuable insights.
So, how do you sift through the mess? Let’s break it down.
First up, internal validity—does the data actually answer the question you’re asking? If you’re looking to understand customer retention but the data only shows sales trends, well, you’ve got a problem. You’ve got to make sure that the analysis is directly tied to the outcome you care about. Internal validity is all about making sure the research or data set is methodologically sound for the specific issue you're investigating.
Next is external validity, which is all about context. Maybe you’ve seen a study showing that reducing customer wait times increased satisfaction in a restaurant chain. Cool, but does that apply to your tech startup with a completely different customer base? External validity asks: Can these findings be generalized to your situation?
Too often, leaders fall into the trap of thinking, “If it worked for them, it’ll work for us.” But unless your business operates in a nearly identical environment with similar customers, the lessons might not apply. Think of it this way: a chef making pizza doesn’t necessarily need to study the science of soufflés. The principles of baking might be similar, but the execution? Entirely different.
Ah, the classic mix-up. You see a data point that shows two things moving together and think, “Aha! One must cause the other.” This is how myths are born.
Take this hypothetical: An uptick in sales happens every time your company hosts a webinar. Does that mean the webinars cause more sales? Maybe. But what if those months also coincide with the launch of a new product line or a holiday shopping season? This is where causation gets muddy. It’s easy to link two trends, but proving that one causes the other is an entirely different ballgame.
You’ve got to dig deeper to see if there’s a hidden variable influencing both trends (what’s known as a confounding factor). Maybe the webinars get more attention because people are already interested in the new product, not because the webinars themselves are magical.
You wouldn’t judge a movie after watching just the first five minutes, right? Similarly, you shouldn’t make business decisions based on limited data. If a study only involves a tiny sample of people or covers too short a time period, its conclusions might not hold up.
Imagine trying to gauge customer preferences by surveying just 20 people—if they all happen to be fans of a particular product, you might conclude that everyone feels the same way, but that could be wildly off the mark. A larger sample size provides more reliable results and helps ensure you’re not basing decisions on an outlier group.
Here’s a fun fact: Just because something is easy to measure doesn’t mean it’s important. You could track the number of times your company’s website is mentioned in tweets, but does that really drive revenue? Maybe, maybe not. What you really care about is probably something like conversion rates, customer lifetime value, or brand sentiment—things that might take more effort to measure but offer far more insight into the health of your business.
Too often, leaders fall into the trap of focusing on metrics that are convenient rather than impactful. It’s a bit like going to the gym and only lifting the lightest weights because they’re easier to handle. Sure, you’re doing something, but it’s not going to move the needle in the long run.
Finally, let’s talk about confirmation bias. We all have a tendency to believe data that aligns with what we already think, and ignore anything that contradicts it. But if you’re going to make smart decisions, you need to challenge your assumptions. Look for research that supports your data, but also actively seek out opposing studies or analyses.
If all your data is telling you to go left, it’s worth exploring whether someone else’s data says to go right. This doesn’t mean you have to change direction every time, but being aware of alternative viewpoints can make your ultimate decision more informed and robust.
In the end, data is a tool—nothing more, nothing less. How you use it determines whether it’s an asset or a liability. As a leader, your job is to make sure you’re asking the right questions, understanding the limitations of the data, and not getting swept away by numbers that don’t really matter.
Remember: data doesn’t make decisions—you do. And the smartest decisions are always backed by careful scrutiny and thoughtful analysis. So the next time you’re staring at a shiny new report, take a deep breath and dive in with a critical eye. You might just find that data, when treated with respect, is the key to unlocking your next big success.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form